And just like sports teams, some schools are good because they have winners in them.not some diversity mandate. There's no diversity program for white and asian wannabe NFL players or for black and hispanic kids wannabe NHL hockey players. It's one of the few institutions left where you either win or lose based on your ability and IQ. Doesn't matter how you try to diversify a program or school or test scores. This story has been the same since the 1970s in urban areas. So I performed, as did most white kids I knew. My biggest fear was getting kicked out of the house by my immigrant dad because I was blowing the opportunity he fought to give me. And, back then anyway, you usually had 2 white parents at home that would threaten you hard if you didn't perform either. Why? Because they asian kids will definitely catch a beating if they don't perform, they perform. In both public and catholic I saw hispanic and black kids fall behind white and asian kids. I've said it before and will say it again, as someone who went to both public and catholic schools on and off throughout the 80s and then into college, your home life will the majority of the time determine how well you do in school (assuming you are of average intelligence which is the vast majority). Which is a lot of times why Asians may not break into that C level suite unless it's maybe their own company they started in tech or something. This is, of course, somewhat of a stereotype but after 25 years in corporate more common than not. Maybe won't fight or stand up hard for their views when pushing against management. Quiet, shy, super smart with great problem solving skills but not very quick on their feet in pressure situations or overly creative and vocal. The knock on Asian students is that they come into the real world (assuming it's a corporate setting) like robots! Very much a cultural thing. I know idiots that went to Harvard but couldn't hold a conversation with corporate clients thus failing at their job while me, the "street" kid from Queens, had a personality and excelled. Whether such a model will cause some parents to leave the system or make it easier for kids to find the appropriate level of instruction, or cause all schools to raise their academics are questions we’ll have to wait a few years to answer.įortunately in real life where you go to high school and/or college doesn't entirely determine your success or failure. So schools will revert back to the model of tracking that used to predominate. Inevitably, instead of all the “smart” kids going off to a different school, they’ll all go to classes together in the same school with all the other kids. Aside from my opinion that it’s ridiculous to test 4 and 5 year olds for giftedness, and aside from the fact that there aren’t enough “gifted” program spots now for all the kids who do qualify (97th percentile), and aside from the fact academic and intellectual giftedness can manifest itself in many ways besides the G&T tests (remember, Einstein was considered a dummy as a young kid), and aside from the reality that many parents spend big bucks to prep their pre-schoolers for the G&T test.there really is a throwback idea that will result from this -tracking.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |